Skip to Main Content

Journal Evaluation: Overall Quality

Tools to evaluate and identify quality journals

Purpose

First and foremost, this guide is only a guide.  It is intended to help you assess the quality of a journal.

Why does it matter?

  • Maintain the integrity of your research by citing quality sources
  • Learn more about your discipline by identifying important sources
  • Help you determine where to publish

Things to Consider

What does a quality journal look like?

A few things to know about the journal:

  • Acceptance/rejection rates
  • Citations in other journals
  • Found in indexing services
  • Read a few articles from the journal to learn more about the quality of what they publish
  • Metrics (journal impact factor or rank or Eigenfactor)

Evaluating Quality of a Journal

Go to the journal's website.

What you want: Transparency

  • Peer review process/methodology should be explicit
  • Peer review process will not be fast (days)
  • Any and all fees associated with publishing should be listed and should be similar to other reputable journals
  • Should have ISSNs and DOIs
  • Aim, scope, and readership should be clear
  • Owners, management, editorial boards, and governing boards should be available and include contact information
  • Copyright and licensing policies should be articulated
  • Publishing information including research misconduct policies, publishing schedules, journal access, archive policies, and more should all be available on the website

More things to think about:

  • Grammar - watch for typos or vocabulary is below industry standards
  • Layout or picture quality is unprofessional
  • No "About Us" information and/or it is contradictory
  • Missing contact information
  • Dead links
  • Address isn't right (check Google Maps)
  • Editorial board members have no academic credentials
  • Negative reputation - check Cabell's
  • Lack of guidance on manuscripts
Staff LADR